So pulled the third magical shoe out of their fast hat. A shoe that has only improved with each new version - which is also the case with the newest one.
The first edition received mixed reviews; some felt the foam was a bit too firm underfoot. Then came the second edition. Here, replaced about half of the "regular" FlyteFoam Blast with FF Blast+, which gave a softer, yet more responsive feel underfoot.
In , ASICS has taken the next step, so now all the midsole foam is FF Blast+, making the shoes even softer and more responsive. Additionally, they are lighter, now weighing only 218 grams versus 230 grams previously (size 42.5 EU, US 9). And that's a development I like!
ASICS Magic Speed 3 - Feel underfoot
I've used 3 for tempo and short intervals. That's what the shoes are made for, and they excel on faster runs. I can clearly feel these are very light shoes on my feet, which makes me want to run fast in them.
I think Magic Speed 3 is a shoe that is in very good balance. It doesn't feel absurdly soft, nor firm in any way. A good middle ground that I believe most will find pleasant.
If you're looking for a shoe for fast training runs and competitions, it's definitely a great choice, as there are significantly more miles in it than in most . In that sense, it closely resembles its predecessors, just more refined and more enjoyable to run in.
ASICS Magic Speed 3 - Who can use it?
When I say Magic Speed 3 is a fast shoe, it's somewhat true. It's not the fastest shoe on the market, as there are more expensive ones that are quicker, but they typically have fewer good miles than a pair of .
But it's a shoe that, due to its balanced cushioning and simple midsole design, can be used by , who wants something faster to run in. Both beginners and experienced runners.
So if you want a quick shoe for your interval training or tempo runs, or you want a that is more economical than the most expensive on the market, then ASICS Magic Speed 3 is a very solid choice!
Didn't find a favorite?
See the full selection of running shoes here: